Head to head

ASUS ProArt Display PA278CV vs Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0)

Both scored on the same six factors, priced on what you actually pay including delivery, and each claim linked to the source it came from. Prototype data — prices and retailer stock are a fixed demo snapshot from 28 July 2026, not a live feed.

Verdict

Take the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) unless you need support & warranty.

The ASUS ProArt Display PA278CV scores highest at 7.4, but it costs 80,00 € more than the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0), which scores 6.8. That premium buys you support & warranty — 2.6 points of it. Worth it if photo and design work on a budget describes you; otherwise it is money you keep. Watch out for BGR subpixel layout fringes text in Windows on the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0).

Best overallASUS ProArt Display PA278CV — Highest Worth Score here at 7.4, 0.6 ahead of the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0). Best for photo and design work on a budget.
Best valueGigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) — 80,00 € cheaper than the ASUS ProArt Display PA278CV and only 0.6 behind on Worth Score. You give up support & warranty.

Side by side

Add a third product →
The value of a comparison is the differences.
What mattersASUS ProArt Display PA278CVASUSMedium confidenceGigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0)GigabyteMedium confidence
Worth Score7.46.8
Best price329,00 €249,00 €
Price fairness7.48.4
Build quality7.86.4
Performance7.67.8
Longevity8.27.0
Repairability4.23.6
Support & warranty7.85.2
Refresh rate75 Hz170 Hz
PanelIPS, factory-calibrated sRGBIPS (BGR subpixel)
PortsUSB-C 65 W, HDMI 1.4, DP 1.2, 4×USB-A2×HDMI 2.0, DP 1.4, USB-C 10 W, 2×USB-A
Best forPhoto and design work on a budget · Anyone who needs sRGB they can trust · Laptop docking at 65 WTwo machines on one screen via the KVM · Gaming plus a work laptop · People who want USB-C at this price
Avoid ifYou game · You need a wide-gamut or HDR panelYou read text all day · You need accurate colour
Main drawback75 Hz — fine for work, not for playBGR subpixel layout fringes text in Windows

3 identical rows hidden. They are the same for every product here, so they cannot help you choose.

What each score is based on

2 published sources between them

ASUS ProArt Display PA278CV

Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0)

Confidence is computed from those lists, not asserted: ASUS ProArt Display PA278CV is medium on 1, Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) is medium on 1. A factor with nothing behind it says so on the product page rather than borrowing a citation that does not speak to it.

Also compare

All monitors we cover →
Dell UltraSharp U2724DE vs LG UltraGear 27GP850-BASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ vs Dell UltraSharp U2724DEDell S2721QS vs Dell UltraSharp U2724DEASUS ProArt Display PA278CV vs Dell UltraSharp U2724DEDell UltraSharp U2724DE vs LG UltraGear 27GR83Q-BDell UltraSharp U2723QE vs Dell UltraSharp U2724DEASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM vs Dell UltraSharp U2724DEDell UltraSharp U2724DE vs Samsung Odyssey Neo G8Alienware AW3423DWF vs Dell UltraSharp U2724DELG UltraGear 27GP850-B vs MSI G274QPF-QDASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ vs LG UltraGear 27GP850-BDell S2721QS vs LG UltraGear 27GP850-BASUS ProArt Display PA278CV vs LG UltraGear 27GP850-BLG UltraGear 27GP850-B vs LG UltraGear 27GR83Q-BDell UltraSharp U2723QE vs LG UltraGear 27GP850-BASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM vs LG UltraGear 27GP850-BAOC 24G15N vs LG UltraGear 24GS65F-BAOC 24G15N vs ViewSonic VX2758-2KP-MHDLG UltraGear 24GS65F-B vs ViewSonic VX2758-2KP-MHDAOC Q27G3XMN vs LG UltraGear 24GS65F-BDell G2724D vs LG UltraGear 24GS65F-BGigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) vs LG UltraGear 24GS65F-BLG UltraGear 24GS65F-B vs MSI G274QPF-QDAOC Q27G3XMN vs ViewSonic VX2758-2KP-MHDDell G2724D vs ViewSonic VX2758-2KP-MHDGigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) vs ViewSonic VX2758-2KP-MHDMSI G274QPF-QD vs ViewSonic VX2758-2KP-MHDAOC Q27G3XMN vs Dell G2724DAOC Q27G3XMN vs Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0)AOC Q27G3XMN vs MSI G274QPF-QDAOC Q27G3XMN vs ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQAOC Q27G3XMN vs Dell S2721QSDell G2724D vs MSI G274QPF-QDASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ vs Dell G2724DDell G2724D vs Dell S2721QSASUS ProArt Display PA278CV vs Dell G2724DGigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) vs MSI G274QPF-QDASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ vs Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0)Dell S2721QS vs Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0)Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) vs LG UltraGear 27GR83Q-BASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ vs MSI G274QPF-QDDell S2721QS vs MSI G274QPF-QDASUS ProArt Display PA278CV vs MSI G274QPF-QDLG UltraGear 27GR83Q-B vs MSI G274QPF-QDASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ vs Dell S2721QSASUS ProArt Display PA278CV vs ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ vs LG UltraGear 27GR83Q-BASUS ProArt Display PA278CV vs Dell S2721QSDell S2721QS vs LG UltraGear 27GR83Q-BDell S2721QS vs Dell UltraSharp U2723QEASUS ProArt Display PA278CV vs LG UltraGear 27GR83Q-BASUS ProArt Display PA278CV vs Dell UltraSharp U2723QEDell UltraSharp U2723QE vs LG UltraGear 27GR83Q-BASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM vs Dell UltraSharp U2723QEDell UltraSharp U2723QE vs Samsung Odyssey Neo G8Alienware AW3423DWF vs Dell UltraSharp U2723QEASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM vs Samsung Odyssey Neo G8Alienware AW3423DWF vs ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDMApple Studio Display vs Samsung Odyssey Neo G8Alienware AW3423DWF vs Apple Studio Display
Prototype. Prototype data — prices and retailer stock are a fixed demo snapshot from 28 July 2026, not a live feed. Prices are the cheapest delivered price we recorded — 329,00 € and 249,00 € — not a live quote. How we score products.