Head to head
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ vs Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0)
Both scored on the same six factors, priced on what you actually pay including delivery, and each claim linked to the source it came from. Prototype data — prices and retailer stock are a fixed demo snapshot from 28 July 2026, not a live feed.
Verdict
Take the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) unless you need support & warranty.
The ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ scores highest at 7.1, but it costs 20,00 € more than the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0), which scores 6.8. That premium buys you support & warranty — 1.4 points of it. Worth it if a known quantity describes you; otherwise it is money you keep. Watch out for BGR subpixel layout fringes text in Windows on the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0).
Best overallASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ — Highest Worth Score here at 7.1, 0.3 ahead of the Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0). Best for a known quantity.
Best valueGigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) — 20,00 € cheaper than the ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ and only 0.3 behind on Worth Score. You give up support & warranty.
Side by side
Add a third product →The value of a comparison is the differences.
| What matters | ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQASUSMedium confidence | Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0)GigabyteMedium confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Worth Score | 7.1 (best in this comparison) | 6.8 |
| Best price | 269,00 € | 249,00 € (best in this comparison) |
| Price fairness | 7.8 | 8.4 (best in this comparison) |
| Build quality | 7.2 (best in this comparison) | 6.4 |
| Performance | 7.7 | 7.8 (best in this comparison) |
| Longevity | 7.6 (best in this comparison) | 7.0 |
| Repairability | 4.0 (best in this comparison) | 3.6 |
| Support & warranty | 6.6 (best in this comparison) | 5.2 |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 170 Hz |
| Panel | IPS | IPS (BGR subpixel) |
| Ports | 2×HDMI 2.0, DP 1.2, 3.5 mm | 2×HDMI 2.0, DP 1.4, USB-C 10 W, 2×USB-A |
| Best for | A known quantity · Full ergonomic stand adjustment · Mixed work and gaming | Two machines on one screen via the KVM · Gaming plus a work laptop · People who want USB-C at this price |
| Avoid if | You want current-generation response times · You are buying on price alone | You read text all day · You need accurate colour |
| Main drawback | An older panel that newer rivals beat for less | BGR subpixel layout fringes text in Windows |
3 identical rows hidden. They are the same for every product here, so they cannot help you choose.
What each score is based on
2 published sources between themASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ
Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0)
Confidence is computed from those lists, not asserted: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ is medium on 1, Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) is medium on 1. A factor with nothing behind it says so on the product page rather than borrowing a citation that does not speak to it.
Also compare
All monitors we cover →Dell UltraSharp U2724DE vs LG UltraGear 27GP850-BASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ vs Dell UltraSharp U2724DEDell S2721QS vs Dell UltraSharp U2724DEASUS ProArt Display PA278CV vs Dell UltraSharp U2724DEDell UltraSharp U2724DE vs LG UltraGear 27GR83Q-BDell UltraSharp U2723QE vs Dell UltraSharp U2724DEASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM vs Dell UltraSharp U2724DEDell UltraSharp U2724DE vs Samsung Odyssey Neo G8Alienware AW3423DWF vs Dell UltraSharp U2724DELG UltraGear 27GP850-B vs MSI G274QPF-QDASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ vs LG UltraGear 27GP850-BDell S2721QS vs LG UltraGear 27GP850-BASUS ProArt Display PA278CV vs LG UltraGear 27GP850-BLG UltraGear 27GP850-B vs LG UltraGear 27GR83Q-BDell UltraSharp U2723QE vs LG UltraGear 27GP850-BASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM vs LG UltraGear 27GP850-BAOC 24G15N vs LG UltraGear 24GS65F-BAOC 24G15N vs ViewSonic VX2758-2KP-MHDLG UltraGear 24GS65F-B vs ViewSonic VX2758-2KP-MHDAOC Q27G3XMN vs LG UltraGear 24GS65F-BDell G2724D vs LG UltraGear 24GS65F-BGigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) vs LG UltraGear 24GS65F-BLG UltraGear 24GS65F-B vs MSI G274QPF-QDAOC Q27G3XMN vs ViewSonic VX2758-2KP-MHDDell G2724D vs ViewSonic VX2758-2KP-MHDGigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) vs ViewSonic VX2758-2KP-MHDMSI G274QPF-QD vs ViewSonic VX2758-2KP-MHDAOC Q27G3XMN vs Dell G2724DAOC Q27G3XMN vs Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0)AOC Q27G3XMN vs MSI G274QPF-QDAOC Q27G3XMN vs ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQAOC Q27G3XMN vs Dell S2721QSDell G2724D vs MSI G274QPF-QDASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ vs Dell G2724DDell G2724D vs Dell S2721QSASUS ProArt Display PA278CV vs Dell G2724DGigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) vs MSI G274QPF-QDDell S2721QS vs Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0)ASUS ProArt Display PA278CV vs Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0)Gigabyte M27Q (rev. 2.0) vs LG UltraGear 27GR83Q-BASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ vs MSI G274QPF-QDDell S2721QS vs MSI G274QPF-QDASUS ProArt Display PA278CV vs MSI G274QPF-QDLG UltraGear 27GR83Q-B vs MSI G274QPF-QDASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ vs Dell S2721QSASUS ProArt Display PA278CV vs ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ vs LG UltraGear 27GR83Q-BASUS ProArt Display PA278CV vs Dell S2721QSDell S2721QS vs LG UltraGear 27GR83Q-BDell S2721QS vs Dell UltraSharp U2723QEASUS ProArt Display PA278CV vs LG UltraGear 27GR83Q-BASUS ProArt Display PA278CV vs Dell UltraSharp U2723QEDell UltraSharp U2723QE vs LG UltraGear 27GR83Q-BASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM vs Dell UltraSharp U2723QEDell UltraSharp U2723QE vs Samsung Odyssey Neo G8Alienware AW3423DWF vs Dell UltraSharp U2723QEASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM vs Samsung Odyssey Neo G8Alienware AW3423DWF vs ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDMApple Studio Display vs Samsung Odyssey Neo G8Alienware AW3423DWF vs Apple Studio Display
Prototype. Prototype data — prices and retailer stock are a fixed demo snapshot from 28 July 2026, not a live feed. Prices are the cheapest delivered price we recorded — 269,00 € and 249,00 € — not a live quote. How we score products.