AKG K702 vs Audio-Technica ATH-M50x
Both scored on the same six factors, priced on what you actually pay including delivery, and each claim linked to the source it came from. Prototype data — prices and retailer stock are a fixed demo snapshot from 28 July 2026, not a live feed.
The AKG K702 wins on both score and price.
Across these 2 headphones, the AKG K702 has both the highest Worth Score (8.1) and the best score per euro at 139,00 €. That is unusual — normally you trade one for the other. Its weak point is bass rolls off noticeably.
Side by side
Add a third product →| What matters | AKG K702AKGMedium confidence | Audio-Technica ATH-M50xAudio-TechnicaMedium confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Price fairness | 8.8 (best in this comparison) | 8.4 |
| Build quality | 7.2 | 8.0 (best in this comparison) |
| Performance | 8.4 (best in this comparison) | 7.8 |
| Repairability | 8.4 (best in this comparison) | 7.4 |
| Support & warranty | 6.8 | 7.6 (best in this comparison) |
| Noise cancelling | None — open back | None — passive closed back |
| Weight | 235 g | 285 g |
| Connection | Detachable mini-XLR, 6.3 mm | Detachable cable, 3.5 mm + 6.3 mm adapter |
| Replaceable pads | Yes — pads, headband and cable sold separately | Yes — pads and cables sold separately |
| Best for | Wide stage for the money · Long sessions — very light clamp · Detail in the midrange | A first pair of studio headphones · Folding flat for travel · Three detachable cables in the box |
| Avoid if | You want bass · You have no amplifier | You want a neutral response — the bass is lifted · You wear glasses; the clamp is firm |
| Main drawback | Bass rolls off noticeably | Bass is elevated for a monitoring headphone |
5 identical rows hidden. They are the same for every product here, so they cannot help you choose.
What each score is based on
4 published sources between themAKG K702
Audio-Technica ATH-M50x
Confidence is computed from those lists, not asserted: AKG K702 is medium on 2, Audio-Technica ATH-M50x is medium on 2. A factor with nothing behind it says so on the product page rather than borrowing a citation that does not speak to it.