7Hz Timeless vs Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro
Both scored on the same six factors, priced on what you actually pay including delivery, and each claim linked to the source it came from. Prototype data — prices and retailer stock are a fixed demo snapshot from 28 July 2026, not a live feed.
The 7Hz Timeless wins on both score and price.
Across these 2 earbuds, the 7Hz Timeless has both the highest Worth Score (7.4) and the best score per euro at 219,00 €. That is unusual — normally you trade one for the other. Its weak point is flat disc shape fits poorly for many.
Side by side
Add a third product →| What matters | 7Hz Timeless7HzMedium confidence | Samsung Galaxy Buds3 ProSamsungMedium confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Worth Score | 7.4 (best in this comparison) | 7.2 |
| Price fairness | 7.6 (best in this comparison) | 7.0 |
| Performance | 8.9 (best in this comparison) | 8.7 |
| Longevity | 7.8 (best in this comparison) | 7.2 |
| Repairability | 6.6 (best in this comparison) | 2.4 |
| Support & warranty | 3.0 | 7.8 (best in this comparison) |
| Battery (ANC on) | — | 6 h |
| Noise cancelling | Passive isolation only | Excellent, adaptive |
| Water resistance | — | IP57 buds |
| Codecs | — | SSC Hi-Fi, AAC, SBC |
| Case charging | — | USB-C + wireless |
| Best for | Hearing what a planar driver does differently · Fast, textured bass · Detail at moderate volume | Galaxy owners wanting 24-bit audio · Strong adaptive ANC · Tight ecosystem integration |
| Avoid if | You have small ears — the discs are wide · You want plug-and-play from a phone | You are not on a Galaxy phone · You disliked the switch to stems |
| Main drawback | Flat disc shape fits poorly for many | Hi-res audio needs a recent Galaxy handset |
3 identical rows hidden. They are the same for every product here, so they cannot help you choose.
What each score is based on
5 published sources between them7Hz Timeless
Confidence is computed from those lists, not asserted: 7Hz Timeless is medium on 2, Samsung Galaxy Buds3 Pro is medium on 3. A factor with nothing behind it says so on the product page rather than borrowing a citation that does not speak to it.