OnePlus Buds 3 vs Samsung Galaxy Buds FE
Both scored on the same six factors, priced on what you actually pay including delivery, and each claim linked to the source it came from. Prototype data — prices and retailer stock are a fixed demo snapshot from 28 July 2026, not a live feed.
The OnePlus Buds 3 wins on both score and price.
Across these 2 earbuds, the OnePlus Buds 3 has both the highest Worth Score (7.0) and the best score per euro at 69,00 €. That is unusual — normally you trade one for the other. Its weak point is feature set is trimmed on non-OnePlus phones.
Side by side
Add a third product →| What matters | OnePlus Buds 3OnePlusMedium confidence | Samsung Galaxy Buds FESamsungMedium confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Best price | 69,00 € (best in this comparison) | 79,00 € |
| Price fairness | 9.0 (best in this comparison) | 8.4 |
| Build quality | 7.2 (best in this comparison) | 7.0 |
| Performance | 7.9 (best in this comparison) | 7.4 |
| Longevity | 6.8 | 7.0 (best in this comparison) |
| Support & warranty | 5.6 | 7.8 (best in this comparison) |
| Battery (ANC on) | 6.5 h | 6 h |
| Noise cancelling | Good, up to 49 dB claimed | Moderate, roughly 30 dB |
| Water resistance | IP55 | IPX2 |
| Codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Best for | LDAC without spending three figures · Android users outside Samsung · Long battery life per charge | Galaxy phone owners · Wingtips that actually stay in · A cheap pair with real software support |
| Avoid if | You want long-term firmware support · You are on iOS | You are not on Samsung · You want high-resolution codecs |
| Main drawback | Feature set is trimmed on non-OnePlus phones | No SSC or aptX outside Samsung phones |
4 identical rows hidden. They are the same for every product here, so they cannot help you choose.
What each score is based on
3 published sources between themOnePlus Buds 3
Samsung Galaxy Buds FE
Confidence is computed from those lists, not asserted: OnePlus Buds 3 is medium on 1, Samsung Galaxy Buds FE is medium on 2. A factor with nothing behind it says so on the product page rather than borrowing a citation that does not speak to it.